Critical Realism and Layered Ontology

Tags

critical-realism philosophy-of-science ontology methodology Roy-Bhaskar

Connected Concepts

emergence-vs-reduction interpretive-social-science methodological-pluralism

Core Insight

Critical realism, primarily developed by Roy Bhaskar, offers a stratified ontology that distinguishes between the empirical (what we observe), the actual (events that occur), and the real (underlying causal mechanisms). This framework provides a middle path between naive empiricism and constructivism.

Three Domains of Reality

The Empirical: What we can observe and measure

  • Experimental results, survey data, observable behaviors
  • Always partial and theory-laden
  • The domain of traditional empiricism

The Actual: Events that occur (whether observed or not)

  • Real happenings in the world
  • May not be directly observable
  • Includes counterfactual events

The Real: Underlying causal mechanisms and structures

  • Powers, tendencies, and capacities of objects
  • May be inactive or counteracted by other mechanisms
  • The fundamental level that generates events

Implications for Research

Methodological Pluralism

Critical realism supports using different methods to access different levels:

  • Quantitative: Good for identifying patterns in the empirical domain
  • Qualitative: Better for understanding actual events and real mechanisms
  • Mixed methods: Can triangulate across domains

Explanation vs Prediction

  • Focus shifts from prediction (empiricist goal) to explanation of underlying mechanisms
  • Retroduction: Working backwards from effects to likely causes
  • Understanding why something works, not just that it works

Personal Application

This framework helps me think about my trilingual cognition research:

  • Empirical: Reaction times, error rates in experiments
  • Actual: Cognitive switching events, interference patterns
  • Real: Underlying neural mechanisms, cultural-linguistic structures

It also informs my Nepal-based research approach—understanding how local contexts (real domain) generate specific social patterns (actual) that may differ from what surveys capture (empirical).

Tensions and Questions

Realism vs Social Construction: How do we balance acknowledgment of real structures with recognition that human meanings shape social reality?

Access Problem: If real mechanisms are often unobservable, how do we avoid speculation while doing more than describing patterns?

Cultural Specificity: Are the causal mechanisms we identify universal, or do they vary across cultural contexts? This is particularly relevant for cognitive science research.

Connection to Current Work

Critical realism provides a philosophical foundation for:

  1. Interpretive social science: Taking seriously both social construction and underlying structures
  2. Cross-cultural research: Understanding how universal mechanisms manifest differently in different contexts
  3. Methodological choices: Justifying why different research questions require different approaches

This framework helps bridge the gap between rigorous scientific methodology and recognition of interpretive complexity—essential for research that spans cultures and disciplines.